The Future of the Legal Profession
  • Home
  • Manifesto
  • Blawg
  • My Books
  • Book Synopsis
  • Sample chapter
  • Value Pricing
  • Store & Links
  • FAQ's
  • Loan Application Form
  • Blog

MSP's support the Legal Services Bill

29/4/2010

0 Comments

 
Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) have backed controversial plans to introduce so-called "Tesco law" in Scotland.

Despite what the lawyers themselves think, MSPs gave their backing to the Legal Services (Scotland) Bill at yesterday’s stage one debate, but agreed that amendments were needed at stage two to address concerns.

The bill, which would allow solicitors set up in partnership with other professionals, such as surveyors or accountants as alternative business structures (ABS), will now go to the Scottish Parliament’s Justice Committee for further scrutiny.

The bill would also allow external ownership or external funding of law firms and could see organisations such as banks or supermarkets providing legal services in Scotland for the first time.

In its first reading at Holyrood, MSPs backed it by 92 votes to two.
0 Comments

Turkeys won't vote for Christmas

22/4/2010

0 Comments

 
Solicitors voted against the introduction of alternative business structures (ABS) in Scotland at a special general meeting of the Law Society of Scotland yesterday.

The vote, including proxy votes, was 1817 in favour of a motion from the Scottish Law Agents Society against ABS as proposed in the Legal Services (Scotland) Bill, with 1290 against the motion, and five abstentions.

A compromise amendment on the introduction of “Tesco Law” had been proposed by McGrigors’ managing partner, Richard Masters.

The firm sought to remove the part of the SLAS motion declaring that external ownership of legal practices would be reserved to those qualified as solicitors, and state instead that majority ownership should be in the hands of such persons, "or persons so qualified together with other persons who are regulated professional owner managers of that business".

However, the amendment was rejected.

Of course it was...can't have the public getting a better service. We're lawyers after all. 

We studied for years and deserve to have our monopoly protected. Yawn.

I said it before and I'll say it again, legal reform will not be driven by what lawyers do
or do not want, it will be driven by economics and social change.  People needing
legal services will vote with their wallets and the firms that deliver the best service
will get the most business.

All this internal bickering is self-serving and pointless.

Can lawyers prevent change? No. Their strength could "oppose" the Bill, but so what?

Just as "money" finds the friendliest place to live, so too will consumers find the
friendliest place to do business.

Spend time and effort on that and christmas WILL be worth having.
0 Comments

Phew...What a Close One!

8/4/2010

0 Comments

 
Scotland’s solicitors have voted narrowly in favour of legal services reform – by a margin of just 24.

In the first referendum question, 2,245 members of the Law Society of Scotland voted to support the current policy in favour of alternative business structures being introduced to Scotland – as long as there are appropriate safeguards – while 2,221 voted against.

The second question, on whether Law Society should apply to be a regulator of ABS, 3,622 solicitors – 81 per cent – voted in favour, while 844 voted against.

In what was the biggest turnout in a Law Society referendum, a total of 4,466 solicitors – 43 per cent of the society’s membership – voted in a secret ballot which closed at midday on Wednesday 7 April.

Ian Smart, president of the Law Society of Scotland, said: “The narrowness of the result clearly illustrates just how the issue has brought out widely divergent views across the profession.


0 Comments

Law Society Vote Delayed

6/4/2010

0 Comments

 
I didn't post the "For" vote argument and link as the vote has been delayed.

The Law Society of Scotland has announced that the reconvened special general meeting on alternative business structures (ABS) will be held at the Sheraton Grand Hotel in Edinburgh on Friday 16 April at 10 am.

The initial part of the SGM on Friday 25 March was adjourned to allow for further discussions between the Law Society, the Scottish Law Agents Society and others.

The SGM was held following a requisition by SLAS, which called for a debate over its concerns about proposals to allow external ownership of alternative business structures in the legal services market.

Ian Smart, president of the Law Society of Scotland, said: “I can confirm that discussions are ongoing, but it was important that we set a date for the reconvened meeting.

“The venue has now been secured and I hope that as many of our members as possible can make it along – especially those who took the time to come along to the SGM on 25 March – to continue the meeting and participate in the continuing debate.”

A formal notice to all members will be issued this week.


0 Comments

Think before you vote.

1/4/2010

0 Comments

 
I'm not talking about the General Election....as Bill Shankly would say "It's more important than that". The vote I'm referring to is the Scottish Law Society members vote on the Legal Services Bill and in particular, ownership of Alternative Business Structures (ABS).

The campaign for each Scottish solicitors vote is polarised into two camps;

The vote "For" ABS and the vote "Against".

If you are a Scottish Solicitor with a vote, consider this; "Who is your customer?"

Will this change make the availability of legal services better or worse for the people you serve?

Forget about what you want...because as a solicitor you want an easy life and keeping things the way they always were is easy.

I'll not sit on the fence.  I'm all for ABS and the Legal Services Bill.

More so since Mike Dailly of the Govan Law Centre started spouting socialist tosh
and scaremongering about gangsters taking over law firms.

But You need to think before you vote.  Not voting is a vote and it might not be for the direction you want...so consider both sides.

You can read Mike Dailly's views on voting "Against" here: http://tinyurl.com/ye8frsa

There will be a separate blawg on voting "For" tomorrow.
0 Comments

    Author

    After many years paying lawyers,I became one in 2005 Just in time for the largest upheaval in the law since records began. Brilliant. Exiting times ahead.

    Disclaimer.  The thoughts, ideas and comments on this Blawg ("Blawg - a legal Blog) are my own and not to be confused (unless otherwise stated) with anyone else and certainly not of anyone in the Firm where I used to work and they are not the views of the firm where I used to work.

    Tweets by @ray_mclennan

    Archives

    April 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    April 2018
    September 2017
    November 2016
    September 2015
    January 2015
    May 2014
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    December 2008

    Categories

    All
    10 Rules That Govern Groups
    10 Things That Don\'t Matter
    10 Things That Matter
    3 Choices
    Abs
    Accounts
    Advertising
    Appreciation
    Apps
    Bentley Cars
    Budget
    Cards For All
    Change
    Change Hints
    Charities
    Clay Shirky
    Close Vote
    Coaching
    Competition
    Confirmation Bias
    Conformity
    Creative Destruction
    Customer Service
    Deloitte
    Depression
    Disruptive Technologies
    Droids
    Earning Capacity Of Lawyers
    Economics
    Elephant
    Entrepreneurs
    Facebook
    Fee Income
    Fees
    Frogs
    Fti
    Gene Poool
    George Marshall
    Getting It
    Glasgow Bar Association
    Govan Law Centre
    Government Initiatives
    Group Psychology
    Iphone App
    It Based Law
    John
    KPI\'s
    Laptop Lawyer
    Law As A Commodity
    Law Firm Broker
    Law Firm Start Up
    Law Society
    Leadership
    Legal Docs
    Legal Education
    Legal Firms\' Accounts 2009
    Legal Services Bill
    Legal Websites
    Marketing
    Mdp
    Measurement
    Mental Health
    Mergers
    Minimum Wage
    Modernise Or Die
    More Sales
    Musings
    New Technology
    Office Politics
    Online Docs
    Overcharging
    Partnerships
    Pep
    Perceived Indifference
    Pkf
    Pro Bono Work
    Pro-Bono Work
    Pwc
    Royal Faculty Of Procurators
    Rss Feed
    Sales
    Self Esteem
    Self-esteem
    Self Improvement
    Seo Strategies
    Seth Godin
    Socialism
    Social Media
    Solutions
    Substance Abuse
    Tax
    Tesco Law
    The Firm
    Trainees
    Tribes
    Trust
    Turnaround Time
    Twitter
    Two Killers
    Value Pricing
    Values
    Verasage
    Verasage Institute
    Websites
    Who Gets It?
    You Tube

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    RSS Feed

    Buy1GIVE1 - Transaction Based Giving